↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00402-004-0765-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Stengel, Kai Bauwens, Axel Ekkernkamp, Jörg Cramer

Abstract

The reputation of total ankle arthroplasty for treating end-stage ankle arthritis of different origin is dubious. Newer generation meniscal-bearing prostheses may have overcome the known problems with earlier implants. There is, however, no systematic approach to the available scientific evidence allowing for a critical appraisal of their benefits and risks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 46%
Engineering 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2008.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,660
of 144,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.