Title |
Differential ability of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonists to induce and modulate expression and reinstatement of cocaine place preference in rats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psychopharmacology, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00213-006-0473-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Danielle L. Graham, Regis Hoppenot, April Hendryx, David W. Self |
Abstract |
D1-Like agonists are self-administered by drug-naive animals, whereas D2-like agonists reinstate cocaine-seeking behavior, but the rewarding and reinstating effects of D1- and D2-like agonists in pavlovian-based conditioned place preference are equivocal. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 24% |
Researcher | 18 | 23% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 35% |
Neuroscience | 17 | 22% |
Psychology | 14 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,099
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,040
of 66,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.