↓ Skip to main content

Cultural differences in lateral biases on aesthetic judgments: The effect of native reading direction

Overview of attention for article published in Culture and Brain, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Cultural differences in lateral biases on aesthetic judgments: The effect of native reading direction
Published in
Culture and Brain, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40167-018-0062-6
Authors

Meghan E. Flath, Austen K. Smith, Lorin J. Elias

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 54%
Arts and Humanities 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,377,308
of 23,628,742 outputs
Outputs from Culture and Brain
#40
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,403
of 360,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture and Brain
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,628,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.