↓ Skip to main content

Imaging Brain Activity With Voltage- and Calcium-Sensitive Dyes

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
Title
Imaging Brain Activity With Voltage- and Calcium-Sensitive Dyes
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10571-005-3059-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley J. Baker, Efstratios K. Kosmidis, Dejan Vucinic, Chun X. Falk, Lawrence B. Cohen, Maja Djurisic, Dejan Zecevic

Abstract

This paper presents three examples of imaging brain activity with voltage- or calcium-sensitive dyes and then discusses the methodological aspects of the measurements that are needed to achieve an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Internally injected voltage-sensitive dye can be used to monitor membrane potential in the dendrites of invertebrate and vertebrate neurons in in vitro preparations. Both invertebrate and vertebrate ganglia can be bathed in voltage-sensitive dyes to stain all of the cell bodies in the preparation. These dyes can then be used to follow the spike activity of many neurons simultaneously while the preparations are generating behaviors. Calcium-sensitive dyes that are internalized into olfactory receptor neurons in the nose will, after several days, be transported to the nerve terminals of these cells in the olfactory bulb. There they can be used to measure the input from the nose to the bulb. Three kinds of noise are discussed. a. Shot noise from the random emission of photons from the preparation. b. Vibrational noise from external sources. c. Noise that occurs in the absence of light, the dark noise. Three different parts of the light measuring apparatus are discussed: the light sources, the optics, and the cameras. The major effort presently underway to improve the usefulness of optical recordings of brain activity are to find methods for staining individual cell types in the brain. Most of these efforts center around fluorescent protein sensors of activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Switzerland 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 258 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 28%
Researcher 72 25%
Student > Master 28 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 27 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 40%
Engineering 42 15%
Neuroscience 35 12%
Physics and Astronomy 20 7%
Chemistry 10 4%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 27 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,494,737
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#152
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,534
of 61,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them