| Title |
Prevalence and classification of headache in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Rheumatology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10067-005-0186-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Lessa, Alex Santana, Isabella Lima, José Martônio Almeida, Mittermayer Santiago |
| Abstract |
Studies on the prevalence of headache in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have shown that it varies from 32 to 78%. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of headache in SLE compared with patients with different types of diffuse connective tissue diseases (DCTD) and its relationship with clinical and laboratory manifestations of SLE. We studied patients with SLE (SLE group) and patients with DCTD (control group). All patients were made to answer questionnaire to assess the presence of headache, characterized by at least five episodes of headache during the last year, which was classified according to the International Headache Society criteria. A total of 207 patients were studied, 115 in SLE group and 92 in the control group. The 1-year prevalence of headache was 75.7% in SLE group and 66% in the control group. When the groups were analyzed, 66.1% met the diagnostic criteria for migraine in the SLE group compared with 52.2% in the control group (p=0.04) and 13.9% for tension-type headache in SLE group compared with 16.3% in the control group. The former was the only variable that reached statistical significance comparing the two groups. Both headache and migraine were associated with Raynaud's phenomenon in SLE patients (odds ratio of 2.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-7.05, p=0.02 and odds ratio of 2.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-5.23, p=0.03, respectively). These results suggest that headache is a common manifestation in SLE and in other DCTD and we cannot exclude the possibility that it may be related to the emotional stress induced by such clinical situations. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 50% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,139
of 2,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,629
of 154,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.