| Title |
Why is it Crucial to Use Personalized Occlusion Pressures in Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Rehabilitation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40846-018-0397-7 |
| Authors |
James A. McEwen, Johnny G. Owens, Jeswin Jeyasurya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 7 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 47 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 77 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,238,035
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
#5
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,658
of 329,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them