↓ Skip to main content

The Cosmic Ray Nucleonic Component: The Invention and Scientific Uses of the Neutron Monitor – (Keynote Lecture)

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The Cosmic Ray Nucleonic Component: The Invention and Scientific Uses of the Neutron Monitor – (Keynote Lecture)
Published in
Space Science Reviews, July 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1026567706183
Authors

John A. Simpson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 20%
Unspecified 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#533
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,225
of 39,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them