↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics-based graph matching for augmented CT-CBCT

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanics-based graph matching for augmented CT-CBCT
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11548-018-1755-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Garcia Guevara, Igor Peterlik, Marie-Odile Berger, Stéphane Cotin

Abstract

Augmenting intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with preoperative computed tomography data in the context of image-guided liver therapy is proposed. The expected benefit is an improved visualization of tumor(s), vascular system and other internal structures of interest. An automatic elastic registration based on matching of vascular trees extracted from both the preoperative and intraoperative images is presented. Although methods dedicated to nonrigid graph matching exist, they are not efficient when large intraoperative deformations of tissues occur, as is the case during the liver surgery. The contribution is an extension of the graph matching algorithm using Gaussian process regression (GPR) (Serradell et al. in IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 37(3):625-638, 2015): First, an improved GPR matching is introduced by imposing additional constraints during the matching when the number of hypothesis is large; like the original algorithm, this extended version does not require a manual initialization of matching. Second, a fast biomechanical model is employed to make the method capable of handling large deformations. The proposed automatic intraoperative augmentation is evaluated on both synthetic and real data. It is demonstrated that the algorithm is capable of handling large deformations, thus being more robust and reliable than previous approaches. Moreover, the time required to perform the elastic registration is compatible with the intraoperative navigation scenario. A biomechanics-based graph matching method, which can handle large deformations and augment intraoperative CBCT, is presented and evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Engineering 4 17%
Computer Science 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,436,785
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#215
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,393
of 330,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.