↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the D1 dopamine full agonists, dihydrexidine and doxanthrine, in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the D1 dopamine full agonists, dihydrexidine and doxanthrine, in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson's disease
Published in
Psychopharmacology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00213-011-2625-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

John D. McCorvy, Val J. Watts, David E. Nichols

Abstract

Preclinical evidence indicates that D₁ dopamine receptor full agonists have potential as therapeutic agents for a variety of neurological conditions. Dihydrexidine (DHX) was the first high potency selective D₁ dopamine receptor full agonist and has been studied as a possible treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Recently, we discovered doxanthrine (DOX), an oxygen bioisostere of DHX that has even greater selectivity for the D₁ dopamine receptor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Chemistry 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,099
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,177
of 241,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.