| Title |
Chinese guidelines for treatment of adult primary immune thrombocytopenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Hematology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12185-018-2445-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin-guang Liu, Xiao-chuan Bai, Fang-ping Chen, Yun-feng Cheng, Ke-sheng Dai, Mei-yun Fang, Jian-Ming Feng, Yu-ping Gong, Tao Guo, Xin-hong Guo, Yue Han, Luo-jia Hong, Yu Hu, Bao-lai Hua, Rui-bing Huang, Yan Li, Jun Peng, Mi-mi Shu, Jing Sun, Pei-yan Sun, Yu-qian Sun, Chun-sen Wang, Shu-jie Wang, Xiao-min Wang, Cong-ming Wu, Wen-man Wu, Zhen-yu Yan, Feng-e Yang, Lin-hua Yang, Ren-Chi Yang, Tong-hua Yang, Xu Ye, Guang-sen Zhang, Lei Zhang, Chang-cheng Zheng, Hu Zhou, Min Zhou, Rong-fu Zhou, Ze-ping Zhou, Hong-li Zhu, Tie-nan Zhu, Ming Hou |
| Abstract |
Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a bleeding disorder commonly encountered in clinical practice. The International Working Group (IWG) on ITP has published several landmark papers on terminology, definitions, outcome criteria, bleeding assessment, diagnosis, and management of ITP. The Chinese consensus reports for diagnosis and management of adult ITP have been updated to the 4th edition. Based on current consensus positions and new emerging clinical evidence, the thrombosis and hemostasis group of the Chinese Society of Hematology issued Chinese guidelines for management of adult ITP, which aim to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical decision making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#1,104
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,551
of 329,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.