↓ Skip to main content

Managing Gait, Balance, and Posture in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Managing Gait, Balance, and Posture in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11910-018-0828-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina Debû, Clecio De Oliveira Godeiro, Jarbas Correa Lino, Elena Moro

Abstract

Postural instability and gait difficulties inexorably worsen with Parkinson's disease (PD) progression and become treatment resistant, with a severe impact on autonomy and quality of life. We review the main characteristics of balance instability, gait disabilities, and static postural alterations in advanced PD, and the available treatment strategies. It remains very difficult to satisfactorily alleviate gait and postural disturbances in advanced PD. Medical and surgical interventions often fail to provide satisfactory or durable alleviation of these axial symptoms, that may actually call for differential treatments. Exercise and adapted physical activity programs can contribute to improving the patients' condition. Gait, balance, and postural disabilities are often lumped together under the Postural Instability and Gait Difficulties umbrella term. This may lead to sub-optimal patients' management as data suggest that postural, balance, and gait problems might depend on distinct underlying mechanisms. We advocate for a multidisciplinary approach from the day of diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Researcher 15 6%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 100 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 14%
Neuroscience 30 11%
Engineering 10 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 114 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,387,654
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#633
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,085
of 329,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.