↓ Skip to main content

Multiparametric MRI for Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer after HIFU:Is DCE still needed?

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Multiparametric MRI for Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer after HIFU:Is DCE still needed?
Published in
European Radiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5352-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raïssa Lotte, Alexandre Lafourcade, Pierre Mozer, Pierre Conort, Eric Barret, Eva Comperat, Malek Ezziane, Paul-Hugo Jouve de Guibert, Sebastian Tavolaro, Lisa Belin, Franck Boudghene, Olivier Lucidarme, Raphaële Renard-Penna

Abstract

To assess the added value of the dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence (DCE) to combination T2-weighted imaging (T2w) + diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound). Forty-five males with clinical and biological suspected PCa recurrence were retrospectively selected. All underwent multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) before biopsies. Two readers independently assigned a Likert score of cancer likelihood on T2w + DWI + DCE and T2w + DWI images. Prostatic biopsies were taken as the gold standard. Recurrent PCa was identified at biopsy for 37 patients (82%). Areas under the receiver-operating curve of T2w + DWI and T2w + DWI + DCE imaging were not significantly different for both readers. Using a Likert score ≥ 3 for the PCa diagnosis threshold, sensitivity at the lobe level for the (1) senior and (2) junior reader for T2w +DWI +DCE sensitivity was (1) 0.97 and (2) 0.94 vs. (1) 0.94 and (2) 0.97 for T2w + DWI. Accuracy of mpMRI was not significantly improved by adding DCE to T2w + DWI. Sensitivity was high for T2w + DWI + DCE and T2w + DWI with no significant difference for either the junior or senior reader. • MpMRI has the capability to detect PCa recurrence in post-HIFU monitoring. • The sensitivity of T2w and DWI for detecting PCa recurrence was not improved by DCE. • Readers with different degrees of experience did not improve their performance with DCE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,075,788
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,917
of 4,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,445
of 329,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#28
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.