↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
26 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
381 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1128/cmr.00004-07
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Fotedar, D. Stark, N. Beebe, D. Marriott, J. Ellis, J. Harkness

Abstract

The genus Entamoeba contains many species, six of which (Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, Entamoeba polecki, Entamoeba coli, and Entamoeba hartmanni) reside in the human intestinal lumen. Entamoeba histolytica is the causative agent of amebiasis and is considered a leading parasitic cause of death worldwide in humans. Although recent studies highlight the recovery of E. dispar and E. moshkovskii from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, there is still no convincing evidence of a causal link between the presence of these two species and the symptoms of the host. New approaches to the identification of E. histolytica are based on detection of E. histolytica-specific antigen and DNA in stool and other clinical samples. Several molecular diagnostic tests, including conventional and real-time PCR, have been developed for the detection and differentiation of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii in clinical samples. The purpose of this review is to discuss different methods that exist for the identification of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii which are available to the clinical diagnostic laboratory. To address the need for a specific diagnostic test for amebiasis, a substantial amount of work has been carried out over the last decade in different parts of the world. The molecular diagnostic tests are increasingly being used for both clinical and research purposes. In order to minimize undue treatment of individuals infected with other species of Entamoeba such as E. dispar and E. moshkovskii, efforts have been made for specific diagnosis of E. histolytica infection and not to treat based simply on the microscopic examination of Entamoeba species in the stool. The incorporation of many new technologies into the diagnostic laboratory will lead to a better understanding of the public health problem and measures to control the disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 459 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 87 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 11%
Student > Master 53 11%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 91 19%
Unknown 122 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 46 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Other 40 8%
Unknown 133 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,810,735
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#521
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,398
of 79,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.