↓ Skip to main content

Strength, size and activation of knee extensors followed during 8 weeks of horizontal bed rest and the influence of a countermeasure

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Strength, size and activation of knee extensors followed during 8 weeks of horizontal bed rest and the influence of a countermeasure
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00421-006-0241-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. R. Mulder, D. F. Stegeman, K. H. L. Gerrits, M. I. Paalman, J. Rittweger, D. Felsenberg, A. de Haan

Abstract

Changes in the quadriceps femoris muscle with respect to anatomical cross sectional area (CSA), neural activation level and muscle strength were determined in 18 healthy men subjected to 8 weeks of horizontal bed rest (BR) with (n = 9) and without (n = 9) resistive vibration exercise (RVE). CSA of the knee extensor muscle group was measured with magnetic resonance imaging every 2 weeks during bed rest. In the control subjects (Ctrl), quadriceps femoris CSA decreased linearly over the 8 weeks of bed rest to -14.1 +/- 5.2% (P < 0.05). This reduction was significantly (P < 0.001) mitigated by the exercise paradigm (-3.5 +/- 4.2%; P < 0.05). Prior to and seven times during bed rest, maximal unilateral voluntary torque (MVT) values of the right leg were measured together with neural activation levels by means of a superimposed stimulation technique. For Ctrl, MVT decreased also linearly over time to -16.8 +/- 7.4% after 8 weeks of bed rest (P < 0.01), whereas the exercise paradigm fully maintained MVT during bed rest. In contrast to previous reports, the maximal voluntary activation remained unaltered for both groups throughout the study. For Ctrl, the absence of deterioration of the activation level might have been related to the repeated testing of muscle function during the bed rest. This notion was supported by the observation that for a subset of Ctrl subjects (n = 5) the MVT of the left leg, which was not tested during BR, was reduced by 20.5 +/- 10.1%, (P < 0.01) which was for those five subjects significantly (P < 0.05) more than the 11.1 +/- 9.2% (P < 0.01) reduction for the right, regularly tested leg.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Professor 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4,069
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,708
of 88,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.