↓ Skip to main content

Ranaviruses (family Iridoviridae): emerging cold-blooded killers

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Ranaviruses (family Iridoviridae): emerging cold-blooded killers
Published in
Archives of Virology, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/s007050200000
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. G. Chinchar

Abstract

Although possessing novel replicative and structural features, the family Iridoviridae has not been as extensively studied as other families of large, DNA-containing viruses (e.g., poxviridae and herpesviridae). This oversight most likely reflects the inability of iridoviruses to infect mammals and birds, and their heretofore low pathogenicity among cold-blooded animals and invertebrates. In fact, the original frog virus isolates (e.g., frog viruses 1-3) would likely have been considered orphan viruses since they were isolated from apparently healthy frogs. However, recent disease outbreaks among commercially and recreationally important fish, cultured and wild frogs, and endangered salamanders has challenged this benign view and have implicated several members of the genus Ranavirus as pathogens. This review explores three facets of ranavirus biology. In the first the salient features of ranavirus replication are summarized using frog virus 3 as a model. Secondly, criteria for characterizing new ranavirus isolates, based on biochemical (viral protein profiles, DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms, and nucleotide sequence analysis), ecological (host range, tissue tropism), and clinical considerations, are detailed. Lastly, the principal agents of ranavirus-mediated disease and immune responses to these viruses are discussed. In light of the above, it is clear that ranaviruses are no longer orphan viruses, and that they have a significant impact on diverse populations of ectothermic animals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 129 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 9 7%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Environmental Science 9 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,903,595
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#398
of 4,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,655
of 46,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.