↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility of Histopathological Diagnosis in Poorly Differentiated NSCLC: An International Multiobserver Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility of Histopathological Diagnosis in Poorly Differentiated NSCLC: An International Multiobserver Study
Published in
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.1097/jto.0000000000000425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Thunnissen, Birgit I. Witte, Andrew G. Nicholson, On behalf of all authors

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#3,268
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,530
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#69
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.