| Title |
4E × 2 Instructional Model: Uniting Three Learning Constructs to Improve Praxis in Science and Mathematics Classrooms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Science Teacher Education, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10972-008-9114-7 |
| Authors |
Jeff C. Marshall, Bob Horton, Julie Smart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 26% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 45% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Teacher Education
#117
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,517
of 311,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Teacher Education
#55
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.