↓ Skip to main content

Diel Acid Fluctuations in C4 Amphibious Grasses

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthetica, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 129)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Diel Acid Fluctuations in C4 Amphibious Grasses
Published in
Photosynthetica, June 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1006927327013
Authors

J.E. Keeley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 50%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthetica
#36
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,604
of 33,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthetica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them