↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study of the bonding in heteroatom analogues of benzene

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A comparative study of the bonding in heteroatom analogues of benzene
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01113243
Authors

Nikita Matsunaga, Thomas R. Cundari, Michael W. Schmidt, Mark S. Gordon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 60%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#183
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,366
of 61,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them