↓ Skip to main content

Plasma Elaidic Acid Level as Biomarker of Industrial Trans Fatty Acids and Risk of Weight Change: Report from the EPIC Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma Elaidic Acid Level as Biomarker of Industrial Trans Fatty Acids and Risk of Weight Change: Report from the EPIC Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Véronique Chajès, Carine Biessy, Pietro Ferrari, Isabelle Romieu, Heinz Freisling, Inge Huybrechts, Augustin Scalbert, Bas Bueno de Mesquita, Dora Romaguera, Marc J. Gunter, Paolo Vineis, Camilla Plambeck Hansen, Marianne Uhre Jakobsen, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Guy Fagherazzi, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Verana Katzke, Jasmine Neamat-Allah, Heiner Boeing, Ursula Bachlechner, Antonia Trichopoulou, Androniki Naska, Philippos Orfanos, Valeria Pala, Giovanna Masala, Amalia Mattiello, Guri Skeie, Elisabete Weiderpass, Antonio Agudo, Jose Maria Huerta, Eva Ardanaz, Maria Jose Sánchez, Miren Dorronsoro, Jose Ramon Quirós, Ingegerd Johansson, Anna Winkvist, Emily Sonested, Tim Key, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicolas J. Wareham, Petra H.M. Peeters, Nadia Slimani

Abstract

Few epidemiological studies have examined the association between dietary trans fatty acids and weight gain, and the evidence remains inconsistent. The main objective of the study was to investigate the prospective association between biomarker of industrial trans fatty acids and change in weight within the large study European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,016,255
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,522
of 194,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,333
of 357,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#802
of 4,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.