↓ Skip to main content

Failure to Use Movement in Postural Strategies Leads to Increased Spinal Displacement in Low Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Spine, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure to Use Movement in Postural Strategies Leads to Increased Spinal Displacement in Low Back Pain
Published in
Spine, September 2007
DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e31814541a2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola W. Mok, Sandra G. Brauer, Paul W. Hodges

Abstract

Lumbar and hip movements, before and in response to rapid bilateral arm flexion, were evaluated in 10 people with recurrent low back pain (LBP) and 10 matched control subjects when standing on a flat surface or short base.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
New Zealand 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 127 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,536,995
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Spine
#4,723
of 8,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,149
of 81,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine
#31
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.