↓ Skip to main content

Malignant monstrocellular brain tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, March 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Malignant monstrocellular brain tumours
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, March 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01577735
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Palma, P. Celli, A. Maleci, N. Di Lorenzo, G. Cantore

Abstract

A series of 42 cases of monstrocellular brain tumour (MBT) who received surgery over a 34 year period is reviewed with the aim of gaining more understanding of the biology of this oncotype. A case of benign pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma was identified among the cases and is discussed in another paper. In this series, as in most others taken from the literature, MBTs were more frequent in young subjects (55% were under 50 years of age and 17% were children) and presented as a superficially located (63%), often sharply circumscribed (42%) mass. The mean survival time for 24 patients treated by surgery and radiotherapy (RT) was 57 weeks compared to 32 weeks for 12 treated by surgery alone (p less than 0.02). Patients younger and older than 50 years showed the same survival and the slightly better course of children did not reach statistical significance. Besides postoperative RT, the only other factor that showed a significantly positive influence on survival was the presence of a definite lymphocytic infiltration (LI) in the tumour (p less than 0.05). This result confirms our previous study on the prognostic influence of LI in glioblastoma (GB). Actually, we noted that the prolonged survival of both MBT and GB patients exhibiting a definite LI (67% and 11.5%, respectively, in the two series) was strikingly similar. We conclude that MBT is a peculiar oncotype with a probably better prognosis than GB in the majority of cases. Lymphocytes seem to play a major prognostic role and giant-monstrous cells are indirectly implicated, reasonably enhancing the host's immune response by magnifying the antigenic stimulus.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Materials Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#583
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,961
of 14,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them