| Title |
Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Maria Brambilla, Stefano Aliberti, Elena Prina, Francesco Nicoli, Manuela Del Forno, Stefano Nava, Giovanni Ferrari, Francesco Corradi, Paolo Pelosi, Angelo Bignamini, Paolo Tarsia, Roberto Cosentini |
| Abstract |
The efficacy of noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to improve outcomes in severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) due to pneumonia has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to compare CPAP vs. oxygen therapy to reduce the risk of meeting criteria for endotracheal intubation (ETI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Italy | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,779,904
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,696
of 4,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,211
of 227,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.