| Title |
Does the Pirani score predict relapse in clubfoot?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11832-010-0287-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vitali Goriainov, Julia Judd, Mike Uglow |
| Abstract |
Presented here is a retrospective clinical audit of clubfoot patients to determine the value of the Pirani clubfoot scoring system at initial presentation in the estimation of subsequent relapse. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,259,845
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
#292
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,978
of 99,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them