↓ Skip to main content

Advances in micro- and nanotechnologies for the GLP-1-based therapy and imaging of pancreatic beta-cells

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Diabetologica, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Advances in micro- and nanotechnologies for the GLP-1-based therapy and imaging of pancreatic beta-cells
Published in
Acta Diabetologica, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00592-017-1086-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faruk H. Moonschi, Corey B. Hughes, George M. Mussman, John L. Fowlkes, Chris I. Richards, Iuliana Popescu

Abstract

Therapies to prevent diabetes in particular the progressive loss of β-cell mass and function and/or to improve the dysregulated metabolism associated with diabetes are highly sought. The incretin-based therapy comprising GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors have represented a major focus of pharmaceutical R&D over the last decade. The incretin hormone GLP-1 has powerful antihyperglycemic effect through direct stimulation of insulin biosynthesis and secretion within the β-cells; it normalizes β-cell sensitivity to glucose, has an antiapoptotic role, stimulates β-cell proliferation and differentiation, and inhibits glucagon secretion. However, native GLP-1 therapy is inappropriate due to the rapid post-secretory inactivation by DPP-4. Therefore, incretin mimetics developed on the backbone of the GLP-1 or exendin-4 molecule have been developed to behave as GLP-1R agonists but to display improved stability and clinical efficacy. New formulations of incretins and their analogs based on micro- and nanomaterials (i.e., PEG, PLGA, chitosan, liposomes and silica) and innovative encapsulation strategies have emerged to achieve a better stability of the incretin, to improve its pharmacokinetic profile, to lower the administration frequency or to allow another administration route and to display fewer adverse effects. An important advantage of these formulations is that they can also be used at the targeted non-invasive imaging of the beta-cell mass. This review therefore focuses on the current state of these efforts as the next step in the therapeutic evolution of this class of antidiabetic drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 36%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 2 4%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Chemistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#765
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,390
of 440,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.