| Title |
Ancient Chinese observations of planetary positions and a table of planetary occultations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Moon, and Planets, February 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00056020 |
| Authors |
Liu Ciyuan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,086,534
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#6
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292
of 49,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them