↓ Skip to main content

Advances in computer‐assisted syndrome recognition by the example of inborn errors of metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Advances in computer‐assisted syndrome recognition by the example of inborn errors of metabolism
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10545-018-0174-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean T. Pantel, Max Zhao, Martin A. Mensah, Nurulhuda Hajjir, Tzung‐Chien Hsieh, Yair Hanani, Nicole Fleischer, Tom Kamphans, Stefan Mundlos, Yaron Gurovich, Peter M. Krawitz

Abstract

Significant improvements in automated image analysis have been achieved in recent years and tools are now increasingly being used in computer-assisted syndromology. However, the ability to recognize a syndromic facial gestalt might depend on the syndrome and may also be confounded by severity of phenotype, size of available training sets, ethnicity, age, and sex. Therefore, benchmarking and comparing the performance of deep-learned classification processes is inherently difficult. For a systematic analysis of these influencing factors we chose the lysosomal storage diseases mucolipidosis as well as mucopolysaccharidosis type I and II that are known for their wide and overlapping phenotypic spectra. For a dysmorphic comparison we used Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome as another inborn error of metabolism and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome as another disorder that is also characterized by coarse facies. A classifier that was trained on these five cohorts, comprising 289 patients in total, achieved a mean accuracy of 62%. We also developed a simulation framework to analyze the effect of potential confounders, such as cohort size, age, sex, or ethnic background on the distinguishability of phenotypes. We found that the true positive rate increases for all analyzed disorders for growing cohorts (n = [10...40]) while ethnicity and sex have no significant influence. The dynamics of the accuracies strongly suggest that the maximum distinguishability is a phenotype-specific value, which has not been reached yet for any of the studied disorders. This should also be a motivation to further intensify data sharing efforts, as computer-assisted syndrome classification can still be improved by enlarging the available training sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,069,737
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#491
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,313
of 329,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.