↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of airway surface liquid volume by human airway epithelia

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of airway surface liquid volume by human airway epithelia
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, December 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00424-002-0955-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Boucher

Abstract

Mucus clearance on airway surfaces is a primary form of pulmonary defense. The efficiency of mucus clearance in large part depends on the volume of the airway surface liquid components, including both the periciliary liquid (PCL) layer and the mucus layer. Studies with in vitro model systems suggest that the mucus layer acts as a passive reservoir to redistribute water to and from, as needed, the PCL layer. In contrast, the overall volume of airway surface liquid is determined by active transepithelial salt transport. Data from in vitro systems suggest that airway epithelia have the capacity to both absorb and secrete liquid in response to the volume requirements on the apical surface. At present, the nature of the signals that transmit information about airway surface liquid volume to epithelia and their sensors are unknown. However, progress in elucidation of this system is important, because it appears that these systems are deranged in the genetic disease cystic fibrosis, which is characterized by airway surface liquid volume depletion, mucus stasis, and chronic infection. Thus, insights into these systems may offer novel therapeutic opportunities to correct this physiologic dysfunction of airway epithelia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 34%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Engineering 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#248
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,500
of 135,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.