↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous but not experimental metastatic activities differentiate primary tumor-derived vs metastasis-derived mouse prostate cancer cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, November 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Spontaneous but not experimental metastatic activities differentiate primary tumor-derived vs metastasis-derived mouse prostate cancer cell lines
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, November 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1018499515883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon J. Hall, Timothy C. Thompson

Abstract

We previously developed an in vivo mouse prostate reconstitution (MPR) model of metastatic prostate cancer using p53 'knockout' mouse urogenital sinus tissue for retroviral transduction of ras and myc oncogenes (Thompson et al., Oncogene, 10, 869, 1995). We further demonstrated contrasting responses to transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta1) in three matched pairs of early passage cell lines derived from primary prostate tumors and lung metastases generated by this model system (Sehgal et al., Cancer Res, 56, 3359, 1996). In this study we tested these cell lines for growth potential in subcutaneous and orthotopic (dorso-lateral prostate) locations and metastatic activities in both spontaneous and experimental assays. Subcutaneous and orthotopic tumors produced by cell lines derived from metastatic lesions tended to grow less rapidly but demonstrated greater spontaneous metastatic potential than the cell lines derived from primary tumors. In contrast all cell lines produced lung colonies in an experimental metastasis assay (tail vein inoculation) with the primary tumor-derived cell lines yielding higher activities in two of three matched pair analyses. The ability of all cell lines to produce lung metastases in the experimental assay, while only the metastasis-derived cell lines retain the ability to initiate and complete the entire metastatic pathway in the spontaneous assay, suggests that intravasation may be the rate-limiting step in metastasis in this model system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 13%
China 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
#220
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,403
of 29,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them