↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of the Materials Composition in External Core Catchers for Nuclear Reactors

Overview of attention for article published in Atomic Energy, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 198)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Optimization of the Materials Composition in External Core Catchers for Nuclear Reactors
Published in
Atomic Energy, November 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1022451520006
Authors

V. N. Mineev, F. A. Akopov, A. S. Vlasov, Yu. A. Zeigarnik, O. M. Traktuev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Atomic Energy
#30
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,442
of 52,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Atomic Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them