| Title |
The fluorochrome, calcofluor white, binds oriented to structural polysaccharide fibrils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Protoplasma, March 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01279855 |
| Authors |
W. Herth, E. Schnepf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 41% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#133
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,667
of 6,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them