↓ Skip to main content

Voluntary and forced exercise differentially alters the gut microbiome in C57BL/6J mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Voluntary and forced exercise differentially alters the gut microbiome in C57BL/6J mice
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2015
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01077.2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob M Allen, Margret E Berg Miller, Brandt D Pence, Keith Whitlock, Vandana Nehra, H Rex Gaskins, Bryan A White, John D Fryer, Jeffrey A Woods

Abstract

We have previously shown that voluntary (VWR)attenuates, while forced treadmill exercise (FTR) exacerbates, intestinal inflammation and clinical outcomes in a mouse model of colitis. As the gut microbiome is implicated in colitis, we hypothesized that VWR and FTR would differentially affect the gut microbiome. Mice (9-10/treatment) were randomly assigned to VWR, FTR or sedentary home cage control (SED) for six weeks. VWR were given running wheel access while FTR ran on treadmill for 40 min/d at 8-12m/min, 5% grade. Forty-eight hours after the last exercise session, DNA was isolated from the fecal pellets and cecal contents, and the conserved bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance based on weighted UniFrac distance matrices revealed different bacterial clusters between feces and cecal contents in all groups (p<0.01). Interestingly, the community structures of the three treatment groups clustered separately from each other in both gut regions (p<0.05). Contrary to our hypothesis, the alpha diversity metric, Chao1, indicated that VWR led to reduced bacterial richness when compared FTR or SED (p<0.05). Taxonomic evaluation revealed that both VWR and FTR altered many individual bacterial taxa. Of particular interest, Turicibacter spp., which has been strongly associated with immune function and bowel disease, was significantly lower in VWR vs. SED/FTR. These data indicate that VWR and FTR differentially alter the intestinal microbiome of mice. These effects were observed in both the feces and cecum despite vastly different community structures between each intestinal region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 277 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 16%
Student > Master 41 14%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 71 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#565,679
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#295
of 9,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,304
of 369,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.