↓ Skip to main content

The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
616 Mendeley
Title
The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice
Published in
Environmental Management, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00267-018-1028-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida Nadia S. Djenontin, Alison M. Meadow

Abstract

This review paper addresses the challenging question of "how to" design and implement co-production of knowledge in climate science and other environmental and agricultural sciences. Based on a grounded theory review of nine (9) published case studies of transdisciplinary and collaborative research projects, the paper offers a set of common themes regarding specific components and processes for the design, implementation, and achievement of co-production of knowledge work, which represent the "Modus Operandi" of knowledge co-production. The analysis focuses on practical methodological guidance based on lessons from how different research teams have approached the challenges of complex collaborative research. We begin by identifying broad factors or actions that inhibit or facilitate the process, then highlight specific practices associated with co-production of knowledge and necessary competencies for undertaking co-production. We provide insights on issues such as the integration of social and professional cultures, gender and social equity, and power dynamics, and illustrate the different ways in which researchers have addressed these issues. By exploring the specific practices involved in knowledge co-production, this paper provides guidance to researchers on how to navigate different possibilities of the process of conducting transdisciplinary and co-production of knowledge research projects that best fit their research context, stakeholder needs, and research team capacities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 616 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 16%
Researcher 94 15%
Student > Master 88 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 29 5%
Other 87 14%
Unknown 181 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 140 23%
Social Sciences 89 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 3%
Other 85 14%
Unknown 213 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,828,144
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#104
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,486
of 345,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.