| Title |
Factors in gold nanocatalysis: oxidation of CO in the non-scalable size regime
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Topics in Catalysis, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11244-007-0288-6 |
| Authors |
Uzi Landman, Bokwon Yoon, Chun Zhang, Ueli Heiz, Matthias Arenz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 24% |
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 56 | 47% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 18 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 13 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Topics in Catalysis
#95
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,118
of 71,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in Catalysis
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.