↓ Skip to main content

Categorically wrong? Nominal versus graded measures of ethnic identity

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Categorically wrong? Nominal versus graded measures of ethnic identity
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, September 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02699766
Authors

Henry E. Brady, Cynthia S. Kaplan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 41%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 75%
Linguistics 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#144
of 305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,298
of 37,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.