↓ Skip to main content

State-of-the-Art Imaging in Human Chordoma of the Skull Base

Overview of attention for article published in Current Radiology Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
State-of-the-Art Imaging in Human Chordoma of the Skull Base
Published in
Current Radiology Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40134-018-0275-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rene G. C. Santegoeds, Yasin Temel, Jan C. Beckervordersandforth, Jacobus J. Van Overbeeke, Christianne M. Hoeberigs

Abstract

Chordoma are rare tumours of the axial skeleton which occur most often at the base of the skull and in the sacrum. Although chordoma are generally slow-growing lesions, the recurrence rate is high and the location makes it often difficult to treat. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are crucial in the initial diagnosis, treatment planning and post-treatment follow-up. Basic MRI and CT characteristics of chordoma were described in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Since then, imaging techniques have evolved with increased resolution and new molecular imaging tools are rapidly evolving. New imaging tools have been developed not only to study anatomy, but also physiologic changes and characterization of tissue and assessment of tumour biology. Recent studies show the uptake of multiple PET tracers in chordoma, which may become an important aspect in the diagnosis, follow-up and personalized therapy. This review gives an overview of skull base chordoma histopathology, classic imaging characteristics, radiomics and state-of-the-art imaging techniques that are now emerging in diagnosis, treatment planning and disease monitoring of skull base chordoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,601,965
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Current Radiology Reports
#49
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,657
of 329,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Radiology Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them