↓ Skip to main content

Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?
Published in
Sex Roles, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11199-012-0146-2
Authors

Tadios Chisango, Gwatirera Javangwe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 48%
Social Sciences 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,539,467
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#986
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,921
of 157,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.