↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the Marshall Islands Fireball of February 1, 1994

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of the Marshall Islands Fireball of February 1, 1994
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00671553
Authors

E. Tagliaferri, R. Spalding, C. Jacobs, Z. Ceplecha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 25%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#82
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,425
of 77,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.