| Title |
Avulsion fracture of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon ('Jersey finger') type III
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, November 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00402-001-0352-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shay Shabat, Paul Sagiv, Avi Stern, Meir Nyska |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#348
of 1,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,129
of 49,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.