↓ Skip to main content

Diuretic Drugs Progress in Clinical Pharmacology

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Diuretic Drugs Progress in Clinical Pharmacology
Published in
Drugs, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003495-198600314-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Lant

Abstract

Oral diuretics are amongst the most widely used drugs in clinical practice today. Their discovery close on thirty years ago remains a major milestone in therapeutic progress. Though originally designed for treating heart failure, diuretics are more commonly prescribed, worldwide, in hypertension than for relief of oedema. Since the introduction of chlorothiazide, diuretic development has passed through a series of distinct stages. The thiazide era was followed by the 'high-ceiling' diuretics, the antikaliuretics and, more recently, polyvalent agents that cause both saluresis and uricosuria. Alongside these synthetic achievements, major advances have occurred in the knowledge of nephron function and ion transport mechanisms. These have acted as stimulus to the design of novel categories of diuretics. The practising clinician thus has a wide range of available diuretics to choose from. The most appropriate choice of an agent aimed at the relief of symptoms with minimal adverse effects requires an understanding of where and how diuretics act within their primary target organ, the kidney. Whereas various procedures, ranging from micropuncture to the study of brush border membrane vesicles, have been utilised experimentally, investigation of the mode and sites of action of diuretics in man has largely depended on application of clearance methodology. Refinements in analytical chemistry have encouraged study of the pharmacokinetic and metabolic fate of diuretics. Taken together, available evidence shows that most diuretics exert their saluretic action from the intraluminal aspect of the renal tubules. The time-course of drug delivery, as well as total quantity of drug transported into the lumen determine the cumulative drug response. Exceptions are muzolimine and the aldosterone antagonists which act at the peritubular membrane. Distinctive stereospecific effects on luminal tubular ion transport occur with indacrinone and etozoline. The clinical use of diuretics often involves concurrent administration with other drugs. The mechanisms involved in a number of the resulting pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions have considerable relevance in patient management. Notable examples of these interactions are the blunting of diuretic action by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and the diuretic-induced diminution in the renal clearance of lithium salts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Austria 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,511
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,589
of 202,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#683
of 1,842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.