↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge, Learning and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social-Ecological System Resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
906 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Knowledge, Learning and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social-Ecological System Resilience
Published in
Human Ecology, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10745-006-9008-2
Authors

Fikret Berkes, Nancy J. Turner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 906 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 2%
Canada 9 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 17 2%
Unknown 839 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 221 24%
Student > Master 164 18%
Researcher 135 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 74 8%
Student > Bachelor 63 7%
Other 140 15%
Unknown 109 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 294 32%
Social Sciences 170 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 18%
Arts and Humanities 25 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 2%
Other 91 10%
Unknown 143 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2011.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#386
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,490
of 87,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.