↓ Skip to main content

Understanding William Farr’s 1838 article “On prognosis”: comment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Understanding William Farr’s 1838 article “On prognosis”: comment
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, October 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00038-003-3068-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M. Eyler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Professor 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Computer Science 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#878
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,777
of 56,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them