↓ Skip to main content

DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1020 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
628 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, May 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011115820450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd J.A. Ewing, Shingo Makino, A. Geoffrey Skillman, Irwin D. Kuntz

Abstract

In this paper we describe the search strategies developed for docking flexible molecules to macomolecular sites that are incorporated into the widely distributed DOCK software, version 4.0. The search strategies include incremental construction and random conformation search and utilize the existing Coulombic and Lennard-Jones grid-based scoring function. The incremental construction strategy is tested with a panel of 15 crystallographic testcases, created from 12 unique complexes whose ligands vary in size and flexibility. For all testcases, at least one docked position is generated within 2 A of the crystallographic position. For 7 of 15 testcases, the top scoring position is also within 2 A of the crystallographic position. The algorithm is fast enough to successfully dock a few testcases within seconds and most within 100 s. The incremental construction and the random search strategy are evaluated as database docking techniques with a database of 51 molecules docked to two of the crystallographic testcases. Incremental construction outperforms random search and is fast enough to reliably rank the database of compounds within 15 s per molecule on an SGI R10000 cpu.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
India 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 590 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 152 24%
Student > Master 96 15%
Researcher 88 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 6%
Other 93 15%
Unknown 116 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 134 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 51 8%
Computer Science 50 8%
Other 74 12%
Unknown 131 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,135,151
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#96
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,332
of 42,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them