↓ Skip to main content

Invariants associated with the epsilon algorithm and its first confluent form

Overview of attention for article published in Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2, January 1972
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 123)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
Title
Invariants associated with the epsilon algorithm and its first confluent form
Published in
Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2, January 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf02844229
Authors

P. Wynn

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,135,326
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2
#13
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,368
of 17,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them