↓ Skip to main content

Lava tubes and channels in the lunar Marius Hills

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, December 1971
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Lava tubes and channels in the lunar Marius Hills
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, December 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf00561842
Authors

Ronald Greeley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 24%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 47%
Engineering 8 15%
Physics and Astronomy 7 13%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#82
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,281
of 17,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.