| Title |
New Evidence for Leaf Swallowing and Oesophagostomum Infection in Bonobos (Pan paniscus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1019697915897 |
| Authors |
Jef Dupain, Linda Van Elsacker, Carlos Nell, Paola Garcia, Francisco Ponce, Michael A. Huffman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 61% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#592
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,268
of 49,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.