| Title |
Improving the reproducibility of chemical reactions on the surface of cellulose nanocrystals: ROP of ε-caprolactone as a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellulose, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10570-011-9527-x |
| Authors |
Marianne Labet, Wim Thielemans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 26% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 50 | 38% |
| Materials Science | 19 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2011.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#329
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,293
of 123,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.