↓ Skip to main content

Effects of pesticides commonly used in peach orchards in Brazil on predatory lacewing Chrysoperla carnea under laboratory conditions

Overview of attention for article published in BioControl, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Effects of pesticides commonly used in peach orchards in Brazil on predatory lacewing Chrysoperla carnea under laboratory conditions
Published in
BioControl, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10526-008-9197-2
Authors

Fabrizio P. Giolo, Pilar Medina, Anderson D. Grützmacher, Elisa Viñuela

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 50%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2010.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BioControl
#138
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,052
of 170,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioControl
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.