↓ Skip to main content

Spin-coupled description of the chemical bonding to hypercoordinate chlorine

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Spin-coupled description of the chemical bonding to hypercoordinate chlorine
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, April 2001
DOI 10.1007/pl00013292
Authors

David L. Cooper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#183
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,511
of 43,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them