↓ Skip to main content

Larval development of Lightiella magdalenina (Crustacea, Cephalocarida)

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Larval development of Lightiella magdalenina (Crustacea, Cephalocarida)
Published in
Marine Biology, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00227-007-0735-8
Authors

Alberto Addis, Francesca Biagi, Antonello Floris, Emiliana Puddu, Marcella Carcupino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 6%
Uruguay 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 78%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,801
of 70,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.